[T]he temporal anomaly within nationalism—veering between nostalgia for the past and the impatient sloughing off of the past—is typically resolved by figuring the contradiction in the representation of time as a natural division of gender. Women are represented as the atavistic and authentic body of national tradition (inert, backward-looking and natural), embodying nationalism’s conservative principle of continuity. Men, by contrast, represent the progressive agent of national modernity (forward-thrusting, potent and historic), embodying nationalism’s progressive, or revolutionary principle of continuity. Nationalism’s anomalous relation to time is thus managed as a natural relation to gender.